From Customer Insights to Automation: AI Leadership That Scales
- JR
- Jan 23
- 6 min read
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, January 23, 2026 — Artificial Intelligence should make leadership simpler, not louder.
If AI creates more activity without improving decisions, it isn't AI Strategy. It's expensive busywork. But when AI becomes repeatable internal capability, it creates competitive advantage: faster decisions, clearer customer insights, stronger customer engagement, and customer experience that feels consistent, not automated.
That conviction was validated on Friday, January 23, 2026 in the Oklahoma City area. Session scores were exceptional:
Quality of Content: 5
Quality of Delivery: 5
Applicability: 5
Would Recommend: 100%
The feedback was direct and telling:
"Awesome content."
"It was excellent! I could easily spend another day with Stormie!"
That second line matters. When leaders say they could spend another day on the topic, they're not asking for more theory. They're asking for more build time. More implementation. More chances to turn clarity into action that drives measurable ROI.
What Made This Session Land
There are countless AI sessions available right now. Some are entertaining. Some are technical. Many are interesting but hard to translate into Monday morning work.
This one landed because leaders felt two things simultaneously:
The work felt practical
The work connected to real outcomes, not just tools
One attendee summarized it:
"Great presentation and amazing business use case that can set actionable goals."
Another wrote:
"This was extremely enlightening to me as I really need to take the time to dive deeper in how AI could help our company. Thank you so much for the opportunity to learn from you today. So informative and very clearly delivered."
That's not "AI is cool." That's "I can see where this fits, and I can see what to do next."
This is where AI becomes a real force multiplier. Not because any single department matters most, but because AI sits at the intersection of customer understanding, messaging clarity, speed of execution, and revenue. When AI supports those areas with discipline, it strengthens customer engagement while protecting customer experience.
What the Survey Revealed About Readiness
Eleven attendees completed the post-session readiness assessment. Results explain why a group can feel energized yet still need structure. The appetite exists. The capability is forming.
Company Profile: Mid-Sized, Leader-Led
Company size:
51–250 employees: 6 of 11 (54.5%)
1–50 employees: 4 of 11 (36.4%)
251–1,000 employees: 1 of 11 (9.1%)
Role:
VP/Director: 6 of 11 (54.5%)
Other: 5 of 11 (45.5%)
This matters because mid-sized organizations have enough complexity to feel the pain, but insufficient capacity to throw headcount at every priority. They need leverage. They need systems. That's where AI creates advantage, if implemented with guardrails and ownership.
Ownership Is the First Bottleneck
Who is the single person responsible for driving AI and automation outcomes:
No clear owner: 6 of 11 (54.5%)
Functional leader (Sales/Ops/IT): 3 of 11 (27.3%)
Working group, no single owner: 2 of 11 (18.2%)
More than half operate without a single accountable owner. That's why pilots don't become production. AI leadership isn't about enthusiasm. It's about accountability, focus, and follow-through.
Speed Gaps Create Competitive Disadvantage
When a key performance number drops 15%, how quickly can your team make production changes:
Within a month/quarterly: 6 of 11 (54.5%)
Within a week: 2 of 11 (18.2%)
Same day: 2 of 11 (18.2%)
Rarely, or crisis mode only: 1 of 11 (9.1%)
This is a competitive advantage issue, not a tech issue. The faster you respond to customer signals, the better your customer experience. AI Strategy becomes real when it shortens the time between "we noticed" and "we changed."
Data Exists But Isn't Ready for Speed
If you wanted to run a 30-day AI pilot this month, what data is ready:
Raw data we could label if needed: 6 of 11 (54.5%)
Scattered or siloed exports only: 2 of 11 (18.2%)
Nothing accessible yet: 2 of 11 (18.2%)
Clean, labeled dataset with access controls: 1 of 11 (9.1%)
Most companies have enough to start. Few are set up to scale. That's why early AI wins feel exciting, then suddenly slow down. The unglamorous work of organizing data turns customer insights into something reliable.
Safety Rules Are Catching Up
Current rules for using AI safely:
No protections in place yet: 5 of 11 (45.5%)
Rules exist, partly enforced: 4 of 11 (36.4%)
Informal habits, no consistent enforcement: 2 of 11 (18.2%)
Critical result. If you want stronger customer engagement, you need trust. If you want trust, you need consistent guardrails. AI can help you move faster, but never faster than your standards.
The Pilot Trap Is Real
AI or automation pilots that made it to production in 12 months:
0 (pilots only): 8 of 11 (72.7%)
3 or more: 2 of 11 (18.2%)
1–2: 1 of 11 (9.1%)
Classic "pilot trap." Teams test things, see potential, but don't build the operating rhythm to turn experiments into repeatable workflows.
KPIs Are Missing
Current measurement approach:
No KPIs tied to AI yet: 9 of 11 (81.8%)
Track results occasionally, no one owns KPI: 1 of 11 (9.1%)
At least one use case has clear KPI, named owner, regular review: 1 of 11 (9.1%)
This explains AI fatigue. Without measurement, AI becomes "something we're trying." With measurement, it becomes a system that supports modernization without chaos.
Leaders Want Customer Outcomes But Feel Skills Gap
Number one outcome wanted from AI:
Customer experience: 5 of 11 (45.5%)
Revenue growth: 4 of 11 (36.4%)
Cost reduction: 1 of 11 (9.1%)
Talent/skills gap: 1 of 11 (9.1%)
Number one blocker to AI adoption:
Talent/skills: 8 of 11 (72.7%)
Tech stack/tools: 2 of 11 (18.2%)
Budget: 1 of 11 (9.1%)
This is the heart of BREATHE! Exp's positioning: tools aren't the main constraint. Capability is. Organizations that win won't have the most AI subscriptions. They'll build internal skill, ownership, and repeatable execution.
Confidence Is High But Earned
Confidence that company will be competitive in AI by 2027 (1-10 scale):
Average: 7.55 out of 10
8–10: 6 of 11 (54.5%)
5–7: 5 of 11 (45.5%)
1–4: 0 of 11 (0.0%)
Interest in building an internal AI leader:
Yes: 8 of 11 (72.7%)
No: 3 of 11 (27.3%)
Mature mindset. Leaders aren't panicking. They're planning. But they know planning needs a person, a pathway, and a cadence.
A Learning Moment You Can Take Back to Your Team
If you want to avoid the pilot trap and build real momentum in the next 30 days, use this framework. It's designed to improve customer experience and drive measurable ROI without overwhelming the team.
Step 1: Choose One Customer-Facing Workflow
Pick one workflow where better speed and consistency will improve customer engagement quickly.
Good options:
Lead follow-up and qualification
Proposal drafting and follow-up sequences
Customer support response drafting with human review
Customer onboarding emails and check-ins
Content repurposing that stays aligned to your positioning
Step 2: Define the Outcome Before the Tool
Write one sentence that defines success:
"Reduce response time from 24 hours to 2 hours."
"Increase lead-to-meeting rate by 15%."
"Cut proposal turnaround time in half without losing quality."
This is AI Strategy with a scoreboard.
Step 3: Create Minimum Guardrails That Protect Trust
At minimum, decide:
What data can never be entered into AI tools
What must be reviewed by a human before a customer sees it
Where prompts and approved outputs will be stored for team reuse
Who owns the workflow and approves changes
This protects customer experience while scaling speed.
Step 4: Build a Small Prompt Pack Aligned to Customer Insights
Instead of telling the team "use AI," give them 5–10 prompts they'll actually reuse:
Persona summary prompt (captures customer insights consistently)
Message clarity prompt (tightens language and positioning)
Draft response prompt (lead replies, support responses, follow-ups)
Objection handling prompt (addresses top hesitations)
Quality check prompt (tone, accuracy, next step)
Step 5: Review Weekly for Four Weeks and Decide
Every week, ask:
What did we ship into the workflow?
What improved in the KPI?
What broke or created risk?
What do we adjust next week?
That weekly review is where modernization without chaos becomes real.
Where GPS Summit Fits for Leaders Who Want the Next Level
This workshop feedback clarified one thing: the room doesn't just want exposure to AI. They want capability they can install inside the company. They want AI leadership that moves work from pilots into production, with guardrails and measurement that protect customer experience.
That's what GPS Summit is built to support.
GPS Summit transforms high-potential employees into AI Systems Generalists in three days—faster than MIT's 8-week program, more practical than Stanford's $18K certificate, and designed for companies that need internal capability, not consultant dependence.
Your designated leader learns to identify bottlenecks, build solutions, and drive measurable efficiency gains within a 90-day roadmap. Not theory. Structural capability.
The result: internal leaders who become force multipliers, turning your organization's AI initiatives from scattered experiments into repeatable competitive advantage.
Ready to develop your internal AI leader? Enroll your high-potential employee in GPS Summit
Closing Question
If you could spend one more day building something practical with your team, what customer-facing workflow would you improve first, so customers feel the difference in customer experience and the business sees measurable ROI?
Comments